Controversies surrounding the best TV series of the 21st century

Compiling a list of the best television series of the 21st century is a challenging endeavor, especially when it comes to 100 titles. This task has proven to be a subject of controversy, as recently illustrated by The New York Times, which has received significant criticism for its list. Notably absent are important international hits like 'The Sopranos', raising questions about the criteria used to justify this decision.

Critics of the list point to the subjectivity of such compiled rankings. What is a masterpiece to one may be less impactful to another. This calls into question The New York Times' reputation as an authority in cultural value, especially in an era where diversity and inclusion are becoming increasingly important in the media.

Furthermore, the absence of iconic series like 'The Sopranos' raises questions about the methodology employed. There are countless popular and influential series that have attracted a broad audience and left a lasting impression. Omitting these titles may create a perception that the selected series reflect a narrow perspective, possibly aimed at a specific demographic or taste.

This discussion highlights that compiling a list of the best TV series is far from an objective task. However, it also encourages a broader conversation about television as an art form and its significance in our lives. It calls for a reevaluation of what we consider 'best' and who the voices are that make these decisions.

Read the full article from Bright.